Four Loving Paws Veterinary Services Inc in Brazil, IN Closed now

Reviews about Four Loving Paws Veterinary Services Inc

• ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

  March 27, 2020, by nancy stark
  I am always satisfied with the level of care my animals receive on our visits. The doctors and staff are friendly and make sure I understand everything that is going on with my animals and discuss all options and costs up front. All of my dogs have different personalities and needs and are treated as individuals. There is no "standard" exam here! I have never regretted the decision to make Four Loving Paws the place I go for the care of my furry family members. I have even taken fosters and other family member's animals to them because I wanted to be confident they were getting the best treatment. Thank you Four Loving Paws!
• ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

  November 16, 2019, by Jenni Miles
  Everyone there are amazing and the doc is the most outstanding, caring doc. I always refer people to come to them because he is the best and so is the staff. Thank you
• ★ ☆ ☆ ☆ ☆

  March 20, 2019, by Stacy Williamson
  More about money then customer care. I took my puppy there for his first shots the staff and vet was very nice and knowledgeable. I was very impressed with the first visit the cost was about 150.00. When I made the appointment for the second round of shots I ask what the cost would be, I was told it would be $46.00 dollars by the lady who scheduled my appointment. When we went back for the second round of shots. I was charged around 140.00. I told them that was not right and they disagreed because when they made the appointment in the computer they scheduled a Dr. visit (The Dr. did come in room but my puppy didn't need him to and I didn't ask for it). They also made a mistake and gave my puppy a shot that he didn't need and charged me for it. When they told the Dr. I was upset about these charges he said it is better to be over vaccinated then under vaccinated and would not refund that charge for that reason (again that was there mistake why should I pay for it)? They should have tried to make it right.